What is an example of 'just' discrimination?

• A. Requiring the same standards for all tenants
• B. Providing different standards for different kinds of tenants
• C. Allowing preferential treatment to certain tenants
• D. Prohibiting any distinction between tenants

Answer: (B)

The idea being tested is that discrimination can be just when it’s based on legitimate, relevant differences and used to achieve a real objective. Providing different standards for different kinds of tenants fits this because it acknowledges that different tenant categories may have different risk factors or needs, and it applies criteria that are connected to tenancy outcomes (for example, requiring different screening criteria for groups with varying financial or occupancy considerations). This is a structured, objective way to manage risk, not mere bias.

Requiring the same standards for all tenants is equal treatment, not discrimination. Allowing preferential or biased treatment isn’t just and wouldn’t be justified as a general rule. Prohibiting any distinction eliminates any tailored approach and isn’t an example of discrimination either.